I’m happy observe eHarmony responding inside their recognized blog to an article called “Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street log. The WSJ article examines a few of the relationship statistics revealed by dating sites like eHarmony plus the strategy familiar with assess such statistics. We talked a bit about that topic aswell, a couple of weeks ago whenever original WSJ article had been released (see Story).
The WSJ article did not check out kindly about statistics revealed by internet dating sites, and for the most component we buy into the writer. Individuals needs to understand just how these data tend to be generated. Of the many adult dating sites discussed inside WSJ post, “eHarmony stands apart as on the list of a lot more careful types”. This isn’t exactly a glowing document for eHarmony thus, they made a decision to upload an answer on the blog site.
In eHarmony post they go into additional precisely the way they calculated that their unique dating site had been accountable for 2percent of marriages in the United States, through the 12-month duration ending March 2007. The vast majority of info we currently realized about from a previously released PDF document called “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics Number of eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), but the post does remove a few more details. Exactly what this website article does tv show is, eHarmony is attempting to be as available and transparent making use of their study results as you are able to. I do believe title “start telecommunications” may undoubtedly be a good solution when it comes girls down to fuck to official eHarmony blog.
Right here is the full eHarmony response to the Wall Street diary about how precisely they determine their particular wedding stats. For further details about this dating site, study the review of eHarmony.